The editor of the Lancet is an idiot

Discussion in 'Off Topic Discussion' started by Velvet Glove Iron Fist, Jan 13, 2018.

  1. Velvet Glove Iron Fist

    Velvet Glove Iron Fist RSS News Feed

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2016
    One of the big questions about the 'public health' racket is whether its most prominent figures are conscious liars or mere idiots. I have to tell you, dear reader, that I sometimes suspect deliberate deceit.

    Yesterday, I wrote about the absurd claim that 'liver disease is on a trajectory to become the biggest cause of death in England and Wales.' The claim appeared in the Lancet and was made by its editor, Richard Horton. The source for claim seems to be an article published in the same journal last month, although it does not actually support Horton's factoid.

    The reality is that liver disease is responsible for less than two per cent of deaths in England and Wales and its 'trajectory', such as it is, is flat. Several people, including myself, have pointed out this error to Horton and he responded last night with a tweet that doubles down on the original claim.

    For those sceptical of the importance of liver disease in England and Wales, take a look at these graphs. Liver disease deaths are on a trajectory to overtake deaths from ischaemic heart disease. And alcohol is a critically important contributor. MUP is urgently needed. Now. pic.twitter.com/PHw3no4uwk
    — richard horton (@richardhorton1) January 12, 2018


    There is no ambiguity in this tweet: 'Liver disease deaths are on a trajectory to overtake deaths from ischaemic heart disease' (which is currently the biggest cause of death) And yet the graphs he uses to prove this clearly do not show the number of deaths. They show the number of working-age years of life lost before the age of 65, which is a very different thing indeed.

    If Horton is deliberately trying to deceive us here, he is doing so with the Trump tactics of repeating himself and never backing down. I don't think that's his style do I can only conclude that he doesn't understand his own evidence and is an idiot.

    Continue reading...
     

Share This Page